USPTO Requires Non-US Trademark Applicants to Retain US-Licensed Attorneys The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced new rules that went into effect 3 August 2019. Under the new rules, all filings, including new applications and renewal applications, filed by a person or entity not domiciled in the U.S. must be filed by an attorney licensed to practice...

By Alicia J. Samolis On July 15, 2019, Rhode Island’s Governor signed into law the Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act (the “Act”), limiting the enforceability of restrictive covenants with certain employees. Its limited applicability largely makes the law irrelevant, with a handful of critical exceptions. Unlike the Massachusetts law, there is no grandfathering provision – meaning agreements...

By John E. Ottaviani One of the most common reasons U.S. trademark applications receive Office Actions is that the identification of goods and services covered by the application is indefinite or too broad. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requires that the identification of products and services be very specific. This practice is different...

By Alicia J. Samolis & Geri Rosman 1. MEDICAL AND RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA IN THE WORKPLACE. Employers in the Northeast are faced with mounting questions arising from the legalization of medical and recreational marijuana. One challenge is handling compliance with drug-free workplace requirements associated with federal funding or contracts without discriminating against employees. Another involves the potential...

By Colin Coleman and Jeff Sarasohn During Fall 2018, the Boston City Council approved, and Mayor Marty Walsh signed into law, a new City of Boston ordinance regarding Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements (the “Lobbyist Ordinance”). The first periodic disclosure statement under the Lobbyist Ordinance must be submitted no later than July 20, 2019. This...

In a 6-3 decision in Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Supreme Court has declared a provision of the federal trademark law unconstitutional and in violation of the First Amendment protection of free speech.  The provision in question permits the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to refuse to register trademarks that consist of or comprise “immoral”...

https://www.psh.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/PSH-320x212.png

Follow us:

PROVIDENCE OFFICE

40 Westminster Street
Suite 1100
Providence, RI  02903

BOSTON OFFICE

30 Federal Street
Boston, MA  02110

SOUTHCOAST OFFICE

128 Union Street
Suite 500
New Bedford, MA  02740

Copyright ©️ 2026 Partridge Snow & Hahn | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer